Navigation ...
|
|
|
Scientific Writing ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Writing ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference details
| Author(s)
| Year
| Title
| Reference
| View/Download
|
Les Hatton | 1999c | Linux and the CMM | WEB | Linux_and_CMM.pdf |
Synopsis and invited feedback
Peer review is important and acquiring competent reviewers is becoming a major problem for the journals today so I will be very happy to include constructive comment (positive or negative) with acknowledgement. If I am not competent to judge your commentary I will try and find somebody who is.
If you would like to provide feedback just e-mail me here.
| Synopsis
| Invited Feedback
| Importance (/10, author rated :-) )
|
| Provides experimental data comparing the reliability of Linux machines against various forms of Windows showing that Linux is between 2 and 3 orders of magnitude more reliable than any form of Windows. The paper goes on to ask why and shows that in an informal CMM audit, Linux development is level 1. So why is it arguably the most reliable major application the human race has ever produced ? The paper goes on to try and answer why. | None yet | 7 |
Related links
| Related papers and links
|
| Sorry, no links registered in database yet. |
Auto-generated: $Revision: 1.43 $, $Date: 2008/03/03 23:38:56 $, Copyright Les Hatton 2001-
|
