Navigation ...
|
|
|
Scientific Writing ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Writing ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference details
| Author(s)
| Year
| Title
| Reference
| View/Download
|
Darrel Ince Les Hatton, John Graham-Cumming | 2012b1 | The case for open computer programs | doi:10.1038/nature10836 | Nature_nearfinal.pdf |
Synopsis and invited feedback
This work was or is being reviewed by domain-specific experts appointed independently.
If you would like to provide feedback just e-mail me here.
| Synopsis
| Invited Feedback
| Importance (/10, author rated :-) )
|
| A detailed case arguing that scientific results which do not include the source code of any software used to produce them are not intrinsically reproducible and therefore not a product of the scientific method.
Please note that in line with Nature requirements, this is not the form as published, which has additional references, notably to Schwab, Karrenbach and Claerbout (2000) who grasped this nettle early. | None yet | 10 |
Related links
| Related papers and links
|
| Sorry, no links registered in database yet. |
Auto-generated: $Revision: 1.63 $, $Date: 2020/01/25 16:18:09 $, Copyright Les Hatton 2001-
|
