Tree

Navigation ...

lh_home.png
lh_personal.png

Scientific Writing ...

lh_AA.png
lh_AC.png
lh_BE.png
lh_CS.png
lh_DA.png
lh_ED.png
lh_GE.png
lh_GP.png
lh_LW.png
lh_MA.png
lh_ME.png
lh_PR.png
lh_RE.png
lh_SA.png
lh_SF.png

Other Writing ...

lh_AR.png
lh_ES.png
lh_MU.png
lh_SP.png

Reference details


Author(s) Year Title Reference View/Download

Les Hatton , Andy Roberts

1994

How accurate is scientific software ?

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(10), p. 785-797No downloadable files available yet

Synopsis and invited feedback

This work was or is being reviewed by domain-specific experts appointed independently.

If you would like to provide feedback just e-mail me here.

Synopsis Invited Feedback Importance (/10, author rated :-) )
Presents the results of a four year study of nine commercial seismic data processing packages written independently in the same programming language and calibrated with the same input data and input parameters. After a normal processing sequence, the nine packages differ in the 1-2 decimal place which is catastrophic. The paper demonstrates that these differences are entirely due to software errors.None yet10

Related links

Related papers and links
Sorry, no links registered in database yet.

Auto-generated: $Revision: 1.58 $, $Date: 2016/01/03 19:07:28 $, Copyright Les Hatton 2001-