Tree

Navigation ...

lh_home.png
lh_personal.png

Scientific Writing ...

lh_AA.png
lh_AC.png
lh_BE.png
lh_CS.png
lh_DA.png
lh_ED.png
lh_GE.png
lh_GP.png
lh_LW.png
lh_MA.png
lh_ME.png
lh_PR.png
lh_RE.png
lh_SA.png
lh_SF.png

Other Writing ...

lh_AR.png
lh_ES.png
lh_MU.png
lh_SP.png

Reference details

Author(s) Year Title Reference View/Download

Les Hatton

2004h

Some empirical test observations in client / server systems

IEEE Computer, 40(5), p.24-29, May 2007GUI_blind.pdf

Synopsis and invited feedback

This work was or is being reviewed by domain-specific experts appointed independently.

If you would like to provide feedback just e-mail me here.

Synopsis Invited Feedback Importance (/10, author rated :-) )
Defect distributions for two products from very different applications areas show that users notice defects much more easily in the graphical user interface than they do in the underlying server even when the server is entirely responsible for the accuracy of the results. This serves as an important warning for users to be a little more careful in inspecting the quality of the output rather than just the way it is presented. The concept is here presented as GUI blindness.None yet9

Related links

Related papers and links
Sorry, no links registered in database yet.

Auto-generated: $Revision: 1.58 $, $Date: 2016/01/03 19:07:28 $, Copyright Les Hatton 2001-