Tree

Navigation ...

lh_home.png
lh_personal.png

Scientific Writing ...

lh_AA.png
lh_AC.png
lh_BE.png
lh_CS.png
lh_DA.png
lh_ED.png
lh_GE.png
lh_GP.png
lh_LW.png
lh_MA.png
lh_ME.png
lh_PR.png
lh_RE.png
lh_SA.png
lh_SF.png

Other Writing ...

lh_AR.png
lh_ES.png
lh_MU.png
lh_SP.png

Reference details

Author(s) Year Title Reference View/Download

Les Hatton

2003d

A proposed grand challenge

WEBLH_ProposedGrandChallenge.html

Synopsis and invited feedback

Peer review is important and acquiring competent reviewers is becoming a major problem for the journals today so I will be very happy to include constructive comment (positive or negative) with acknowledgement. If I am not competent to judge your commentary I will try and find somebody who is.

If you would like to provide feedback just e-mail me here.

Synopsis Invited Feedback Importance (/10, author rated :-) )
The UK decided to run an initiative to invite grand challenges for researchers to tackle over the next 10-20 years. I suggested a grand challenge that we actually measure what we do to learn how and why it goes wrong. It was rejected and there goes another flying pig. Joking aside, I believe passionately that if computer scientists do not constrain their collective tendencies to invent new stuff all the time and spend a little time trying to calibrate and learn from experience then computer science cannot be called a science in the same way that software engineering has little to do with conventional engineering. Measurement and progress are inseparable.None yet153

Related links

Related papers and links
Sorry, no links registered in database yet.

Auto-generated: $Revision: 1.58 $, $Date: 2016/01/03 19:07:28 $, Copyright Les Hatton 2001-